Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Bruce (author)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete by unanimous consensus.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 16:36, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Bruce (author)[edit]

Robert Bruce (author) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO. Lacks WP:FRIND sources. Activity in an Internet news group and marketing blurbs about a book are not sufficient notability for a stand alone article. LuckyLouie (talk) 13:30, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 15:29, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 15:29, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as the current article is still noticeably questionable overall and I found nothing better. SwisterTwister talk 23:09, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Mjolnir. Adam Cuerden (talk) 13:37, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - his books are held in some libraries, but if you change the search to subject:"Bruce, Robert, 1955-", there aren't any articles about him. --211.30.17.74 (talk) 01:50, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - the relevant notability guideline is not really WP:NAUTHOR but rather WP:FRINGE - he is not a novelist, but rather a psychic (or any similar name he wishes to call himself) who writes books. The guy seems to have some presence in the paranormal circles but outside of the echo chamber, zilch. TigraanClick here to contact me 13:05, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.