Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robb Alvey (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Concerns about conflict-of-interest editing are best handled at WP:COIN Mark Arsten (talk) 16:26, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Robb_Alvey

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Robb Alvey isn't a notable figure. He created his own Wikipedia page. He edits it himself, as does others he knows from his website. Robb Alvey does not deserve to be on the website as he does not fit the criteria for a Wikipedia page. Please delete his page immediately. Knea2006 (talk) 23:27, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 July 24. Snotbot t • c » 23:45, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Has been the subject of at least two articles ([1], [2]), don't see any additional reasons to delete. CitiCat^♫ 04:39, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Passes WP:BASIC. Source examples: [3], [4], [5], [6]. Northamerica1000^(talk) 04:52, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep sources show that the article meets the notability guidelines. The fact that he edits the article himself is also not a sufficient rational to delete the article. Finally, what has changed since the last AFDM, December of last year, where there was a consensus was reached that he was notable.--174.93.163.70 (talk) 05:36, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No consensus was reached in the December 2012 discussion. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:37, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.