Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob Moore (property investor)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 10:15, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rob Moore (property investor)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Little reputable online coverage about him, all the coverage that does exist online is from blogs and small local news sites. Also written like an advertisement.

Fails WP:NORG, WP:GNG James Richards 13:19, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. James Richards 13:19, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. James Richards 13:19, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. James Richards 13:19, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. James Richards 13:19, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. James Richards 13:19, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Delete looks like blatant self promotion. LibStar (talk) 14:37, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not LinkedIn.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:29, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Almost certainly created for promotional purposes. Best, GPL93 (talk) 17:55, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete WP:RESUME Alpateya (talk) 20:21, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alpateya is a blocked sock for User:Dorama285. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:21, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

De;ete per WP:GNG. First off, investing in real property is about as mundane as you can get. Secondly, getting into the Guinness Book of Records isn't what it used to be. Third, to re-write this overly promotional article would take many hours. Fourth, we are not a resume service, and in 2020 everybody knows that. Finally, there is not enough coverage about him to write a NPOV article. Bearian (talk) 00:40, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.