Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob Hayter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 01:00, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rob Hayter[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a stunt performer and bit part actor, not referenced well enough to make him includable yet. Actors do not get an automatic free pass over WP:NACTOR just because the article lists roles -- if he doesn't have a strong distinction such as an Oscar or Emmy or CSA nomination, then the notability test he has to pass is not "has had roles", but "has received a WP:GNG-satisfying volume of reliable source coverage for the having of roles". But for sourcing, what we have here is a directory listing in Turner Classic Movies's IMDb substitute -- not a notability-assisting source, for the same reason that the real IMDb isn't -- and one newspaper article that's substantively enough about him to start counting for something. But it takes several pieces of reliable source coverage, not just one, before a person has enough reliable source coverage to pass GNG. So no prejudice against recreation in the future if and when his notability and sourceability jump to another level, but nothing here is enough in and of itself yet. Bearcat (talk) 17:40, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 03:06, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 03:06, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:39, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete I, with a heavy heart, say, for lack of notability as per WP:ARTIST. Clearly, WP:TOOSOON, ergo without prejudice. -The Gnome (talk) 12:09, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: does not meet WP:NACTOR as the roles are all minor. Under-sourced and my searches are not finding anything better. --K.e.coffman (talk) 05:28, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.