Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob Gray OAM

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:37, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rob Gray OAM

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just being awarded the OAM is not enough to prove sufficient notability on wikipedia. This has been discussed before - see Wikipedia:Australian_Wikipedians'_notice_board/Archive_36#OAMs_for_notability for a recent discussion. Is he the subject of significant coverage in independent reliable sources? I don't think so - his OAM seems to be for his work in the navy which almost certainly wouldn't have been reported outside in independent sources. The-Pope (talk) 11:06, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — -- Cirt (talk) 20:11, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:19, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, I have drawn a blank looking for further sources on this person. I'm sure that the work he did to deserve an OAM was of top quality (you don't get one otherwise, generally), but I'm not seeing enough verifiable material for us to construct a BLP here. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 12:44, 9 June 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 05:43, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Biographical article about someone who had a solid but unremarkable career in the Royal Australian Navy. Does not meet Wikipedia's notability criteria. Dolphin (t) 12:28, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.