Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob Emrich
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 00:31, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Rob Emrich (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I cannot verify the appearances that would give notability in the WSJ, NPR or other sources DGG ( talk ) 00:12, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. —Mikemoral♪♫ 03:04, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. —Mikemoral♪♫ 03:04, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 05:40, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable. I couldn't find any significant coverage to meet WP:BIO. --Edcolins (talk) 20:15, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 15:16, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I likewise couldn't find any significant evidence of this persons notability. What I did find are an unusual edit history for the page creator Ucla1979 (talk · contribs), and Google searches for both Emrich and his company that look like someone's been doing some search engine optimization. My apologies to Ucla1979 if I'm wrong, but I believe this to be for all intents and purposes a WP:Vanity page which someone was paid to create. -Wine Guy~Talk 22:30, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.