Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roaming Beasts of Terror

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. I myself cannot give an informed opinion, but I accept MQS's opinion as showing where the consensus lies. DGG ( talk ) 00:26, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Roaming Beasts of Terror

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable independent film. No significant coverage, no articles for any of the principal cast or crew. Google search on the title only brings up 43 unique returns. Fails WP:NFF. MikeWazowski (talk) 21:37, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unremarkable independent film. No significant coverage, what about the following films listed on wikipedia: (Toad Warrior, Max Hell Frog Warrior, Spanish Fly, Hitman City) and the list goes on and on. Clifford's film seem to have some good coverage. A Canadian Newpaper, Two Canadian Radio Stations, IMDB, An official website and six other newspapers that are not listed online that I found by going to the library newspaper search engine. Also, I've watched his films online and they are still online. His films are playing in over 60 film festivals. I found out his films played at a total of 22 so far. 23:39, 9 September 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.168.144.135 (talk)

From the research I've done the films have played in 22 out of 60 film festivals so far, they have had an online premiere I had to pay $10 bucks to watch them, the sites say they will premiere for another two weeks only. They will be having a limited theater run in November on the 3rd and they will be released to DVD in Jan. of 2012. 00:01, 10 September 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.168.144.135 (talk)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:24, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now per WP:TOOSOON. With respects to IP 69.168.144.135, I have myslf been unable to find this film as screening at any film festival. When this one does get release, with the expected critcal commentary and review, the article can be undeleted and expanded accordingly. HOWEVER, as as you assert "six other newspapers that are not listed online that I found by going to the library newspaper search engine", we do have other Canadian editors who could confirm the coverage you found in not-online newspapers if you could share those paper's names with the publication date and page number of the articles of which you speak. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 18:09, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Here is another newspaper article on Clifford Allan Sullivan. Here's the link:

http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=2213805591&Fmt=3&clientId=80182&RQT=309&VName=PQD

20:43, 13 September 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.168.144.134 (talk)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - T P 03:00, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it and get it over with. There is no sense keeping this movie on wikipedia if your not going to keep it's sequel "Satan's Blood Army Unleashed" on wikipedia as well. It's not logical. 05:35, 17 September 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.168.144.134 (talk)

Delete - It does have a IMDB entry [1], but does not meet the WP notability requirements specified in Wikipedia:Notability (films). --Noleander (talk) 17:27, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete insufficient evidence to meet Wikipedia:Notability (films). LibStar (talk) 05:03, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.