Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Road Rules: All Stars

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. With only the nominator arguing to delete, and with the sourcing issue addressed to some degree, there is clearly not any consensus here for deletion. The question of merging is left for talkpage discussion and normal editorial process. Sjakkalle (Check!) 15:32, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Road Rules: All Stars

Delete Article without valid sources. External Link to Road Rules page points to Road Rules 14 (which came a decade later.) Unless there are better sources provided, there is nothing here that would warrant keeping this article.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Zredsox (talk • contribs) 2008/06/15 22:16:18

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:08, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- brew crewer (yada, yada) 15:46, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep

Jaime Moore 19:25, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Keep Article can be better sourced and is one season of a notable series. Zredsox has tagged numerous RW/RR articles, in a regrettable series of WP:TE actions that is somewhat explained here. Townlake (talk) 15:31, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment While I know the closing admin isn't bound by this, here's a link to a resolved AfD on another RW/RR article, brought under the same circumstances. Might be helpful, might not. Townlake (talk) 23:13, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Real World/Road Rules Challenge per lack of secondary sources. –thedemonhog talk • edits 19:52, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I'm working on the sourcing for RW/RR stuff in general; just added a TV.com source and will seek others. Deletion /merger for lack of sources should only take place if the article's content is unsourceable, and given all the other RW/RR seasons have their own pages, I respectfully don't see a compelling need to break the pattern by merging one season into the umbrella article. Townlake (talk) 22:51, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.