Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RjArjun

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW, WP:A10, WP:G12, WP:G3 apply, so I'm closing this now. —SpacemanSpiff 19:47, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RjArjun

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Person not notable. Appears to be a case of ~~WP:CITEKILL~~ WP:BOMBARD. I checked first 20 references cited and none even had mention of RJ Arjun. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 13:59, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Looks like hoax article with non related references.Arthistorian1977 (talk) 14:01, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Article creator had created pages RjLuxArjun and Rj LuxArjun earlier today which was marked for CSD (and deleted). Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 14:10, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:10, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:10, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:10, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as there's simply no improvement. SwisterTwister talk 07:10, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - References used in the articles are seems to be WP:BOMBARD to hoax the notability. It also fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. In addition, the references are talking about RJ Balaji and is a copyvio which has to be nominated under CSD G12, @AKS.9955: have you noted? — Sanskari ^Hangout 14:22, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Yes @Sanskari:. I did notice that but by that time I had filed for AfD already and refrained from reverting the AfD tag. I am sure this will get deleted. Thanks for pointing that out. Cheers, Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 14:45, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's very common.

. — Sanskari ^Hangout 15:26, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.