Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riviera Australia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 00:33, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Riviera Australia[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Purely promotional page created by the company. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 06:31, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:18, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:18, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as although there's a claim of significance, it's a clear thin one since it's only a field that will ultimately consist of PR, hence it's not convincing and it's not a cause for notability, since the sources here are clearly simply trivial and unconvincing, therefore deletion is quite necessary for such blatancy. SwisterTwister talk 00:54, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
delete blatant advert. LibStar (talk) 11:26, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is a cookie cutter spam article. Nick-D (talk) 06:46, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.