Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rivalus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 06:51, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rivalus[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be non-notable; the only relevant result on Google News was this piece http://www.business2community.com/health-wellness/nutritional-supplement-giant-sells-to-nutrivo-0587060 on a "citizen journalist" site (editorial policy). Please note that the attribution to "CNN" is actually CNN's Ireport, another "citizen journalist" site. —rybec 00:02, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I did a more detailed analysis of Airomo (Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Airomo) and noticed several of the same authors who wrote about it also wrote about Rivalus. —rybec 22:36, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 00:15, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 00:16, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 00:16, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 00:16, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nova Scotia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 00:26, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can't even find enough to verify the more basic assertions in the article. What sport was this company's founder and CEO an athlete in? Candleabracadabra (talk) 14:11, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No evidence of notability. I am One of Many (talk) 04:31, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence of notability here; article relies exclusively on primary, user-generated and invalid sources (I even see Frank in citation #9, for gawd's sake — for those unfamiliar with it, it's a Private Eye-style gossip rag which falls in the NEVER EVER EVER EVER EVER NO WAY NO HOW class of sources). If there's ever a good article, relying on good sources, that can be written about this company, then I would have no objection to recreation at that time — but this version is an unconditional delete. Bearcat (talk) 18:03, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.