Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ritu Nanda

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 00:48, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ritu Nanda[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable, "top" insurance agent, insignificant coverage from family lineage. User4edits (talk) 09:57, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, India, and Maharashtra. User4edits (talk) 09:57, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:11, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Delhi-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:11, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The subject of the article Ritu Nanda does seem to have enough coverage in the press and does have a few newsworthy articles. I think she passes basic WP:GNG. WeAreAllHere _talk 07:44, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:11, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: She owns an insurance agency, not a large national or international insurance company. A small business owner is rarely notable. Sourcing is largely obituaries, nothing before that. Oaktree b (talk) 01:38, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: sources are an interview, a press release, a brief mention and a brief notice about her death. Several of her family members are notable but notability is not inherited. S0091 (talk) 18:11, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.