Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ristr8to

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 21:31, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ristr8to[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged as CSD A7 by User:Largoplazo, but I think a full AfD is deserved, seeing as it has been covered by multiple sources. Paul_012 (talk) 15:05, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- SPA-written article on a single outlet? I appreciate that the reviews are good, but how is it notable? Rhadow (talk) 16:57, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:CORPDEPTH ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 17:22, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 18:31, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 18:31, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete insufficient coverage in independent sources to establish notability and even meet WP:CORPDEPTH which requires more. — Ammarpad (talk) 19:57, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and likely salt; the page was speedy-deleted twice this week. It's not a notable coffee shop. power~enwiki (π, ν) 19:54, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.