Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rise & Shine (Ian McLagan album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus that multiple reliable sources exist for this subject. (non-admin closure) Gongshow ^Talk 21:29, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rise & Shine (Ian McLagan album)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Non-notable album with no refs except a review from AllMusic. Tagged with {{notability}} since December 2007. Bjelleklang - talk 18:06, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. WP:BEFORE: There are also reviews from Paste magazine, and PopMatters, and several other articles discussing the album from sources such as the Chicago Sun-Times, No Depression, and there was a NPR item that shows up in GNews. Even if there was no coverage, deletion is rarely appropriate for studio albums by notable artists as there are better alternatives. --Michig (talk) 20:57, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:17, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 00:05, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 02:49, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. As Michig says, sufficient reliable sources exist. GNews reveals a number of potential sources[1], some behind paywalls, but here's No Depression[2] and Austin Chronicle[3].--Arxiloxos (talk) 07:07, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sources exist (online) that demonstrate the notability of this album, as other editors have already pointed out. — sparklism ^hey! 11:17, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.