Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Risa Coda

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:50, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Risa Coda[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A BLP that lacks sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. Significant RS coverage not found. The article is cited to online directories, industry publicity materials, and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. Does not meet WP:PORNBIO / WP:NACTOR. No significant awards or notable contributions to the genre. Criminal charges listed do not rise to the level of encyclopedia notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:38, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:08, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:08, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:08, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:08, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I do not much care to protect these articles, but this one is better than most of its type. It is not the case that there are no reliable sources that discuss the subject directly; there are references from relatively reliable sources such as Sankei, plus relatively reliable tabloid sources like ZakZak and Nikkan Sports, and apparently even some sources in English, which discuss the subject in detail. I am not sure whether the porn-related stuff is notable (probably not), but the singing, writing, and coverage of legal trouble may be. The drug charges listed are much more noteworthy for a celebrity (?) in Japan than they might be in other places, given the harsh drug rules there. Dekimasuよ! 02:14, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:40, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable performer in pronography.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:14, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as no evidence of notbality, Hasnt won any notable/significent awards, Fails PORNBiO & GNG/. –Davey2010^Talk 19:00, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --1l2l3k (talk) 16:31, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Looks like the only coverage in reliable sources is due to that WP:ONEEVENT, which is not a proper basis for writing a BLP. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 01:34, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.