Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Risë Norman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:38, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Risë Norman[edit]

Risë Norman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think coverage of this individual meets the criteria of WP:GNG. References are press releases, blogs (where she's only mentioned), a wedding announcement, and the firm's own site. The Financial Times article requires a subscription (and I can't find the article through my subscription), but from the title it seems like it's not strictly about her. Contested prod. ... discospinster talk 21:20, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:28, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:28, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:28, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • 'Delete a fairly successful business lawyer, but nothing that rieses to the level of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:11, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • 'Delete. Agree, successful attorney. But "partner" is not a WP claim to notability. Agricola44 (talk) 16:22, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete personal success does not overcome GNG Chetsford (talk) 22:17, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.