Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rio 2(2014 Sequal)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Rio (film)#Sequel . MBisanz ^talk 01:57, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rio 2(2014 Sequal)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article should be deleted because WP:CRYSTAL. It's simply too soon to have its own stand-alone article right now, at a later time, then yes. TBr and ley 03:56, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete far too soon per WP:CRYSTAL ... Mediran ^{talk to me!} 03:57, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — Per nom and per Mediran. This unconventional spelling and spacing in the article name also make it an implausible redirect, even at a later time. JFHJr (㊟) 05:30, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Rio (film)#Sequel - Redirecting is better because it is likely the film is happening. Regarding this article, it is far too soon and any details about the film probably haven't been released. A Google News search for "Rio 2 film" produced this and a blog here (this last one proves nothing). However, considering this title's error of spacing and spelling (I should note this is a plausible search term), we could start other redirects later as we get closer and more announcements are released. SwisterTwister talk 05:41, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

- As what JHJJr, it cannot be redirected due to wrong spelling and space. Mediran ^{talk to me!} 10:07, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. --GSK ● talk ● contribs 21:16, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.