Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rinsco

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Shanel 19:07, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rinsco

Non-notable company; less than 50 hits on a Google search for "Rinsco". Andy Saunders 22:59, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non notable local company. Obina 23:14, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Notable status of company not asserted by author; appears to fail criteria set out in WP:CORP for notable company status. (aeropagitica) 23:16, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Stifle 09:31, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It appears that Andy Saunders has wayyy too much time on his hands. I propose a 2 month moratorium on Andy Saunders.. --Beal007 14:24, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Keep Rinsco. Delete Andy Saunders. --Joe bags 18:42, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note: User's second edit. --Andy Saunders 19:09, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep it. I encourage all users who have an up and coming company to file their company names in a similar fashion. -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.153.76.164 (talk • contribs)

Keep. A travesty to delete. -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.6.144.221 (talk • contribs)

Note: 66.153.76.164 blanked the AFD page to vote Keep. -- Andy Saunders 04:34, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Andy Saunders has a vendetta against Rinsco. Time to ban him from the Canadian Quiz Show Circuit. Besides, his mommy always told him to tattle tale on deleters of posts that don't agree with him. --Beal007 13:44, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Ken Jennings <gulp> --Joe bags 15:18, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as failing to establish - well, anything, really. Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] 21:23, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.