Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rinkle Kumari

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Seems like a consensus not to delete, but no consensus between merging and keeping. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:31, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rinkle Kumari[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable person involved in a common occurrence in the region Darkness Shines (talk) 13:19, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It is not common for a young woman to be involved in a law case which goes all the way to the Supreme Court, and the references in the article are more than sufficient to pass WP:GNG. This article has scope for significant expansion. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:20, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Merge these three articles together; Supreme Court cases are notable, but I don't really see a need for three separate articles with more or less the same content. As well, when merging, please check the facts/sources; one article says that the plaintiffs wished to remain with their husbands, while the other says they wished to remain with their parents! –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 18:22, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:03, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:03, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep A court case is not automatic notability, but it appears that some of the coverage has focused on her as an individual. If there is a good candidate to merge, that works too. BennyHillbilly (talk) 07:54, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.