Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riley Evans

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. –Juliancolton ^Happy ^Holidays 14:31, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Riley Evans

No evidence of notability per WP:PORNBIO. Tabercil (talk) 14:41, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Suitable for a comprehensive adult database, but not notable enough for Wikipedia. --Amwestover (talk|contrib) 14:47, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per nom. She fails WP:PORNBIO. Tatarian (talk) 14:54, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation – I hadn't read the pornographic actor criteria, but have now. I agree: (a) no major awards won or nominated for, (b) hasn't made a ground breaking contribution, and (c) hasn't featured much in mainstream media. When I added the profile, I thought that inclusion in the adult film databases and IMDB was enough, however according the these criteria it isn't. P3L3 (talk) 15:25, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Your work and effort are appreciated, but as you found the ladies don't meet notability guidelines for Wikipedia. --Amwestover (talk|contrib) 15:48, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CommentThree WP:PORNBIO nominations in a row? remember WP:NOTCENSORED--Ipatrol (talk) 15:27, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Well that's a red herring. This discussion is clearly about notability. --Amwestover (talk|contrib) 15:48, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Exactly, especially since I'm probably one of the more active participants in Wikipedia:WikiProject Pornography, which this article falls under. Tabercil (talk) 16:00, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
~~Comment~~ Keep- She is a 2009 AVN Award nominee, one of the criteria for inclusion in WP:PORNBIO--Jmundo (talk) 02:44, 14 December 2008 (UTC)--Jmundo (talk) 17:39, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, passes first criteria of WP:PORNBIO for the referenced AVN nomination. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 00:47, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The criteria says that being a serious nominee for an award constitutes notability, but what constitutes a "serious nominee"? According to the source, there are 15 nominees for the category Riley Evans falls under; does that make the movie she's in a "serious nominee"? Anyone from the Pornography project care to weight in? --Amwestover (talk|contrib) 02:49, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Performers are the nominees for individual scenes, not the movies. It's not unknown for a release to have multiple scenes that are nominated under the various categories, and the awards themselves are presented to the participants not the directors. Regarding the other part if you make the final ballot you're a serious contender, same as pretty much every other award. Horrorshowj (talk) 22:52, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep passes the first criteria of WP:PORNBIO based on cited award nomination.Horrorshowj (talk) 22:52, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 (talk) 14:11, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.