Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Right Now UK Tour
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 19:24, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Right Now UK Tour[edit]
- Right Now UK Tour (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
The article is solely a list of tour dates for a short (May to June) tour by an artist recently dropped by his label. I don't consider, nor expect, the tour to be notable and believe that the article is unlikely to ever escape the clutches of WP:NOT#Wikipedia is not a directory. Also of note is that the article was created by a sock puppet, apparently solely to justify fiddling with a template. This flag once was redpropagandadeeds 17:13, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - as nom. This flag once was redpropagandadeeds 17:14, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. kollision (talk) 18:10, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomm, no sources for the tour. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Many otters • One hammer • HELP) 18:27, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It's not anywhere near notable. The nominator gets it right. Timmeh!(review me) 23:20, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP more information is better than less. Being dropped is notable in these times.--DunkinDonutBoy (talk) 03:25, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]- Delete, a non-notable tour that fails to satisfy the general notability guideline with significant coverage in reliable, third-party, sources. Just an indiscriminate collection of fancruft. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 08:55, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep --78.150.254.47 (talk) 10:38, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: see Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions, particularly this one. You need to provide a reason for your opinion. Other editors should note that this IP is likely a sock of the articles (blocked) creator. Cheers, This flag once was redpropagandadeeds 10:42, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Some Information is better than none--Cityonce334 (talk) 14:57, 19 May 2009 (UTC) Account blocked as a sockpuppet account. Icestorm815 • Talk 19:36, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]- Is there any likelihood that "some information" will transcend the mere list it is now? I'm addressing this to you, since I believe that you're the article creator. Cheers, This flag once was redpropagandadeeds 18:28, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.