Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rigging For Oils
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:24, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Rigging For Oils (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Protologism. Ghits. --AbsolutDan (talk) 20:18, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The most this term deserves is inclusion in a list of slang – and then only if independent refs can be found. Richard New Forest (talk) 23:14, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - As original PRODer. Non-notable neologism. §FreeRangeFrog 05:42, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete clever elaborate slang, reasonably concincing for what undergradauates might devise-- but without any actual references. If it can be authenticated, its almost certainly better off in Wiktionary. DGG (talk) 08:11, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I was the one who prodded this one recently, only to see the prod promptly reverted. I can't find any online evidence that this phrase really is popular slang, but even if it is (and there are reliable sources to verify that fact) it belongs in Wiktionary more than it belongs here. 65.213.77.129 (talk) 17:57, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.