Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rick Skene
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. North America1000 18:03, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Rick Skene (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NACTOR. All I'm seeing is a Winnipeg Free Press article. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:31, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Human3015TALK 03:31, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Human3015TALK 03:31, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as I simply see nothing better. Pinging interested subject users MichaelQSchmidt, [email protected] and Davey2010. SwisterTwister talk 05:46, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Only thing I'm finding are mentions and blog-type stuff, Considering he's been an actor for 50 odd years I'm surprised there's nothing on him.., Anyway fails GNG. –Davey2010Talk 09:23, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- AKAs per article:
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Delete for failing WP:ENT, and WP:GNG. Sadly, while he is prolific and the many projects which have used him are themselves notable, he makes no spash. As an actor or stunt person his work might be exemplary, but his role choices (even with named support roles) pretty much guarantees he makes no spalsh. Schmidt, Michael Q. 12:07, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.