Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rick Page

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:50, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rick Page[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person - none of the references demonstrate notability per the WP:BIO guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 15:24, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:29, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Sources I found are not independent and verifiable. Didn't see anything on googlescholar, either. He isn't notable enough to make it past the requirements of WP:BLP.Jimsteele9999 (talk) 15:41, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as spam/promotional. Claim of "best-seller" is referenced to a primary source, highly suspect, IMHO. MikeWazowski (talk) 16:54, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review the content and rewrite to meet Wiki standards. Mr. Page's book, Hope is Not a Strategy is listed under Google Scholar and cited. I'll look for more independent sources to use in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cmbrown000 (talk • contribs) 17:03, 9 August 2012 (UTC) — Cmbrown000 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 05:53, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Seemingly promotional in intent. Not the subject of multiple, substantial, independent pieces of published coverage. Carrite (talk) 15:05, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Promotional. Cites mostly appear to be promotional pages that are written or influenced by the subject. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 13.13.16.2 (talk) 19:34, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.