Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rick Mitry

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2018 March 14.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 21:01, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rick Mitry[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet the GNG or WP:BIO. No significant coverage in independent sources. The references listed in the article merely cover cases the subject has been involved in as a lawyer, and contain only incidental mention of Mitry. Kb.au (talk) 01:19, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Kb.au (talk) 01:20, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Kb.au (talk) 01:20, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per nominator. Subject does not meet general notability requirements and the page's current reference only cover cases he's worked on. Meatsgains (talk) 02:18, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Clearly important within the circles of lawyers in his field, but not notable in an encyclopedic sense. bd2412 T 18:56, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.