Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rick Blatter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's page ☎ ) 07:19, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rick Blatter

Article is not even a Bio, mostly a legal brief and link to external site J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 21:33, 12 January 2006 (UTC) NB This "article" had already been speedy deleted before on 5 January 2006[reply]

Appears to be a candidate for mayorshit for a Canadian town. The article's a voting form forthe town becoming a micronation. Delete. -- Saberwyn - The Zoids Expansion Project 23:25, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not even WP:BIO material, more nonsense. Not notable. -- (aeropagitica) 23:53, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as boules completes :). Laval is a suburb of Montreal, and this article is a bullshit referendum for secession... Segv11 ^{(talk/contribs)} 02:12, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is an article in progress. Your FOUL LANGUAGE and your child-like comments are not only against WIKIPEDIA POLICY, but swearing and indecency is also against international internet protocol and policy. In addition to being ILLEGAL! If you would like to be shut down then keep it up.

You are WELCOME TO DISAGREE as vehemently as you want, that is FREEDOM! But you are not allowed to censor, you are not the SS. Freedom of speech is for everyone... even if YOU do not agree with it.

Please use civilized, intelligent language and DEBATE the issues. You are WELCOME to make intelligent, contructive comments... but don't make me report you. Unsigned comment by User:24.203.134.111; moved from top of article by CLW

The language in question (WP:BALLS and bullshit) appear quite a lot on AfD, this is not special abuse reserved for this article :). The anon may be right that the're not very WP:CIVIL discussion, but the are not usually meant to be inflamatory. The anon is not correct about foul language (per se, as opposed to incivil discussion) being against WIkipedia Policy... and is certainly incorrect about foul language being against internet policy or the law. Legal threats, however are against Wikipedia policy. See my comment below for more detail on why I voted delete. Segv11 ^{(talk/contribs)} 01:12, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unencyclopedic soap box. CLW 15:54, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I think I remember this being deleted once before, except the message was repeated on the bottom in French. -Colin Kimbrell 20:57, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

comment you are correct [1] J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 21:15, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: that would make this eligible for {{db-repost}}; saince even without the French text, this would still be "substantially the same" content. But I think this should run its course in AfD rather than speedy G4, since someone is debating the deletion. Frankly, I sympathise with Canadian cities that want to get out from under the yoke of their provincial governments. (Provincial governments in Canada have a habit of interfering in the municipal politics of their larger cities, and because of the governmental structure, the cities have little power to resist this interference...) Still, this is not a real referendum on a secession that has any chance of being on any ballot in the forseeable future. It just doesn't belong on Wikipedia, at least not in its current form. If Laval, Quebec (or Monreal, or Toronto for that matter) ever manage a secession, even from Provincial control, and cease being "creatures of the Province" then I'll eat my words, and we can have an article on Municipal secession in Canada... Segv11 ^{(talk/contribs)} 01:04, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per CLW --kingboyk 22:01, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable. Stifle 00:06, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Since it's all been said above, i'll echo Segv11 and the anon IP in my reasoning for why this should be deleted -- "Bullshit, Balls, Bullshit, Balls, Bullshit Balls! IN ADDITION TO BEING ILLEGAL! RARRRRRRRR!!!!!!!" :-) Karmafist 01:21, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
Please delete. If it were written in an encyclopedic style, or made sense—I might think differently. However, it's not. D-Rock (Yell at D-Rock) 04:39, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as per CLW Brookie :) - a collector of little round things! ^(Talk!) 11:10, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.