Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richmond Shepard

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR – Juliancolton | ^Talk 19:19, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Richmond Shepard[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:ENT or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 12:47, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:40, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:40, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:41, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – Below are some sources from cursory searches. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:21, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

From the Greek Mimes to Marcel Marceau and Beyond. Scarecrow Press. pp. 168– . (subscription required)
"World's oldest mime knows the language of love" The Times. (subscription required)
"The World's Oldest Mime". The New Yorker. (short article)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades^Godric 13:23, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would opt to keep, NYT has an article on him as primary subject. The article just needs fleshing out more.Mark E (talk) 10:18, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:16, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:16, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 19:42, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- a long career but no significant accomplishments. Copy includes trivia and appears to have been written by an editor closely connected to the subject (I'm not alleging that it was, but it reads as such). Not encyclopedically relevant, so delete. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:00, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.