Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richelle Monk
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 21:28, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Richelle Monk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No sources are given to substantiate claims to notability, including multiple awards. Web search yields only self-published stuff, and news search nothing at all. Favonian (talk) 11:25, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as a useless promotional piece.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 11:38, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No reliable sources found. Daa89563 (talk) 12:27, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:39, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No reliable sources cited or found in search. • Gene93k (talk) 13:51, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – Lacks sources to support notability. ttonyb (talk) 16:08, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Blatant self-promotion of non-notable figure 7triton7 (talk) 08:18, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Doesn't pass WP:BIO. Warrah (talk) 19:32, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Nothing to show it passes WP:BIO. Kyle1278 20:45, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.