Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Ringer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kevin (talk) 08:02, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Ringer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual lacking references to support claims of importance. Limited GHits and no GNEWS to support. ttonyb (talk) 22:45, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete per CSD A7. GlassCobra 16:34, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:02, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:33, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete NN Josh Parris 02:41, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Anybody want to add any reasons? Independent Music Source (talk) 03:33, 15 October 2009 (UTC) — Independent Music Source (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

I listed mine in shorthand, but specifically the article doesn't cite any notability (and is thus not notable, or NN) set out in the guideline Wikipedia:NSONGS. GlassCobra went a step further, and suggested that the criteria for speedy deletion are met - specifically, CSD A7 Josh Parris 04:20, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I can't go with an A7, there's notability asserted - but none of it is proven. He sounds like an independent musician that hasn't made it big, so I have to go on WP:MUSIC criteria here. Unfortunately, Mr. Ringer falls short.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.