Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Posner's "Enlightened Despot"

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 21:33, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Posner's "Enlightened Despot"

OK, question here is, is a book review notable? The book, its author and the author of the review are, without a doubt, but I don't think that confers notability to the review itself. The claim that it's "much cited" appears in reality to be that it was reprinted. I find no evidence the review has been discussed and is anything more than a book review. I doubt the title is a valid search term so I don't see the need for a re-direct elsewhere. _{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 21:27, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. —_{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 21:28, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I would have advocated merging into the article of A Judge in a Democracy as a criticism section, but as the book itself doesn't actually have an article, that's impossible. I have heard of the article and it's received a decent bit of attention, but I don't think it's to the point where I think it should get a wikipedia article about it. Vickser (talk) 22:12, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just to expand I'm not saying that a book review can't be notable. Thomas Huntington's Clash of Civilizations was a book review after all, and it caused such a stir that it would've been notable before he published a book on it. Posner's Enlightened Despot article, while sort of a big deal, is nowhere near Clash level. Vickser (talk) 22:17, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete because its WP:NN and violates WP:NOTOPINION. IZAK (talk) 08:02, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete IN truly exceptional cases a book review can be notable--the destructive review of Keats' poetry in The Quarterly Review is notorious in English literature--there's a less than adequate discussion of it in [Endymion (poem] but it would be a very unusual book review indeed. This is nowhere near it. If the book were important enough for an article the review could be mentioned there. Alternatively, it should be worth a mention in the article on Barak. DGG (talk) 20:25, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.