Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Muhammad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete, CSD A7/CSD G11 refers. Pegasus «C¦T» 10:37, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Muhammad[edit]

Article does not show notability other than as a TV cameraman and mid-level produce. Article refers to I in one part and creators name is the same as the subject's web page. I am unable to find sources indicating sufficient notability for an article. Capitalistroadster (talk) 08:32, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - again another media personal article with only IMDb as a source. And again for my reason, per controversial issue about IMDb reliability, I'd say delete if there is no other non-trivial independent and reliable sources per notability guidelines. Dekisugi (talk) 11:01, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - In fact, I'd even go so far as to argue Speedy Delete. Read the article closely, and then notice the username of the primary editor of the article. And the entire remaining balance of the edits seem to be occuring from an IP based in the UK, which is also significant given the article subject. Seems like a potential vanity project. DJBullfish (talk) 11:40, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Yup - the article switches from third to first person at one point. Seems to be a vanity project clear-cut DJBullfish (talk) 11:49, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, vanity. Borderline speedy as spam. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 14:03, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.