Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Monk
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 02:45, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Some high government official, obviously making himself sound good. Fails WP:BIO. Cool BlueLight my Fire! 12:09, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This is stuff for website of his employer. Pavel Vozenilek 12:27, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this text dump as unusable for Wikipedia, but without prejudice against recreation of the article as this guy might actually be notable [1] (yes I know some results aren't him, but many are) --W.marsh 13:05, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. As head of the United Nations police in Kosovo, almost certainly notable. I added some references. --Eastmain 15:21, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete without prejudice. His career is far less impressive than the creator-subject makes himself sound ("Commander" in the MPS isn't the big boss but a midranking post, fifth of the 11 ranks), but the UN stuff could potentially be notable. Those references aren't valid, though; one's a straightforward personnel-department announcement that he's taken up a new job, and the other's an article on something that happened in Bosnia after he left which happens to include a quote from him. - iridescenti (talk to me!) 17:11, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I am not sure the UK roles are important, but the international ones are. DGG 01:40, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per the other deletes. Acalamari 19:22, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete as resume and COI conflict. — RevRagnarok Talk Contrib 18:25, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Where do you get that from? I agree it should be a weak delete for other reasons, but an autobio isn't even a reason for deletion, let alone for a speedy, so long as it satisfies WP:N & NPOV - iridescenti (talk to me!) 16:17, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.