Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard M. Jennings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. AustralianRupert (talk) 10:11, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Richard M. Jennings

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:SOLDIER or WP:NBIO. All references have been removed by user presumed to be article subject, who has edited the page extensively (and appears to be the original page creator under a different account), but even prior to this user's contributions there were only ever two sources in the article, both articles written by the subject. I'm not seeing enough coverage outside of his own work to warrant keeping this page. Yunshui ^雲 _水 10:11, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 10:22, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 10:22, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nom; just not notable for stand alone article; reads like a press release. A colonel in rank, but nothing of real notability while in the military. Kierzek (talk) 13:11, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Currently un-sourced BLP. Does seem to pass any PROF or SOLDIER criteria. BEFORE doesn't bring up much.Icewhiz (talk) 15:47, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.