Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Kunin (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 03:38, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Kunin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable doctor. Sources cited in the article do not establish notability. Additional search for sources turned up a few low-quality sources, such as from Natural News and other alt-med fan sites. Delta13C (talk) 10:29, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:54, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:54, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete another article on a non-notable medical doctor.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:52, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP:FRINGE subjects have a higher standard of sourcing: the sources need not only to be reliable and in-depth, they also need to provide a sufficiently mainstream take on the subject to provide an adequately neutral point of view. But in this case, even the based standard of WP:GNG for non-fringe subjects has not been met. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:14, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.