Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Hardin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deleted per WP:BIO and WP:LIVING. FCYTravis 12:49, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Hardin

Fails WP:BIO. FCYTravis 11:16, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --Arnzy ^{(whats up?)} 14:19, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral. If this information is reliable, then I think he's notable. But I haven't been able to find information about his company Relevant Label Group. TruthbringerToronto 14:32, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and completely rewrite. Either there are two different people named Richard Hardin or this one is in trouble with the law. See http://72.14.207.104/search?q=cache:tfBmnbIy0IsJ:www.wrcbtv.com/news/index.cfm%3Fsid%3D1778+%22Richard+Hardin%22+%22con+artist%22&hl=en&gl=ca&ct=clnk&cd=1 At this point, I don't trust any of the information in the article, but would like to replace it with information about the alleged scams. TruthbringerToronto 14:56, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - I don't think his alleged actions are worthy of our notice. There is no evidence that the allegations or his alleged actions have gained any sort of notoriety - a four-paragraph news blurb doesn't count. FCYTravis 19:36, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unremarkable criminal. Wile E. Heresiarch 16:24, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.