Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Fraser (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per absence of delete preferences (non-admin closure). Skomorokh 13:06, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Fraser

First, this biography of a (supposedly) living person is entirely unsourced, and has been so for more than one year. Second, while it seems he contributed some lyrics to the songs of Emerson, Lake & Palmer, I do not think that he passes WP:MUSIC, contrary to the findings of the first nomination. He would be notable if he "[h]as credit for writing or co-writing either lyrics or music for a notable composition", but applying this to every song of the said band seems like over-stressing the principle. B. Wolterding (talk) 07:58, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep minimally notable footnote to history, but per discussion at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Richard_Fraser seems tp pass WP:MUSIC. JJL (talk) 18:41, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep meets WP:MUSIC#Criteria_for_composers_and_lyricists. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 22:57, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.