Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard E. Shaw
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 19:33, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Richard E. Shaw (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
PROD contested by Soccertv1 (talk · contribs) with no explanation. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:38, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:39, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:18, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 11:56, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 14:29, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- DO NOT Delete - I believe the article should not be deleted as the player is a professional soccer player in the MLS/ MISL league in the USA. The individual is well known in New York and playing for a fully-pro soccer club and TV work in the USA I thought would be enough to give that player notability. User:soccertv1 —Preceding undated comment added 11:20, 2 May 2012 (UTC).[reply]
- Delete - per nom. He has not received significant coverage or played in a fully pro league, meaning the article fails both WP:GNG and WP:NSPORT. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:18, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.