Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Dominguez
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete Sceptre (Talk) 20:44, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable. Searching for subject in Google didn't bring up a hit in the first 50 entries at least. His iMDB entry is also largely self-created, and does not list any of the movies or television appearances mentioned in the Wikipedia article. The movies listed on iMDB are not mentioned in the Wikipedia article. The two entries on iMDB list are suspect, as it lists him as a writer at age 2 (of a small film) and a director at age 10 (of a film with no votes). In addition, birth year is different on iMDB. - Dharmabum420 02:25, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete clear vanity. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 04:58, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. --Aaron 05:59, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not that famous. --Eeee 06:09, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. Izehar 18:43, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Don't Delete Richard Dominguez is the greatest and should be left on wikipedia. Fizz Jason 18:50, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. BTW he editor who started the article goes by the same name per the edit history. Not notable enough yet. Vanity.--Dakota ~ ε 23:54, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Proof! We want proof, the people cried! -Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy) 02:07, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.