Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Cleveland Drew

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 18:49, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Cleveland Drew[edit]

Richard Cleveland Drew (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notable only as a state circuit court judge, and sources are mostly local to Minden. Notability not inherited from some of his more famous relatives, including his state representative father. Page also created by serial copyright violater whose articles are being PCCed as we speak. FoxyGrampa75 (talk) 16:58, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. FoxyGrampa75 (talk) 16:58, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. FoxyGrampa75 (talk) 16:58, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. FoxyGrampa75 (talk) 16:58, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. FoxyGrampa75 (talk) 16:58, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. State circuit court is not an automatic free pass over our notability standards for judges, but the article is not reliably sourced for the purposes of getting him over the bar he would actually have to clear — as usual for Billy Hathorn content, it is "referenced" to a mix of unreliable sources that are not support for notability at all, clarifying notes that aren't actually references of any sort, and purely tangential referencing of stray biographical facts about his family members, with no evidence whatsoever of reliable source coverage about him. Bearcat (talk) 16:48, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete circuit court judges are the lowest level where criminal trials occur. They are not notable by default. We need lots of significant coverage which is lacking here.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:36, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Per above. --SalmanZ (talk) 22:27, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails WP:JUDGE....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 20:08, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - per Wikipedia:Copyright violations#Addressing contributors, this article created by Billy Hathorn - banned for massive copyright violations - is presumed to be a copyright violation and subject to indiscriminate removal. MER-C 13:13, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.