Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard C. Weaver
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:10, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Richard C. Weaver[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Richard C. Weaver (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Shaking hands with two U.S. presidents doesn't really seem that notable to me. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 01:48, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 01:48, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:56, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete the stuff here really fails under the not news guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:27, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Weak keep he's been the subject of multiple news stories over many years; see Washington Post (2008) Washington Post (2001), Washington Post (2003), LA Times (2003-- paywalled but looks promising), a brief mention here, Roll Call (2005), AP (republished in Sydney Morning Herald (2005), passing in The Telegraph (2014), and similar. It's admittedly rather borderline, but I think his stunts drew sufficiently wide attention for a sufficiently long period of time to avoid WP:BLP1E and WP:NOTNEWS concerns and to push him into the realm of notability. Eddie891 Talk Work 12:41, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:48, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:48, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep based on the news coverage and it is not about a single event. He has done it numerous times. Expertwikiguy (talk) 06:59, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.