Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Barnes (footballer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete - consensus is that the subject doesn't pass notability requirements for a standalone article. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 12:54, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Barnes (footballer)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. No secondary sources included in article (nor could be found on google). Fails both WP:GNG and WP:NSPORT. - GA Melbourne (talk) 11:40, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and United Kingdom. - GA Melbourne (talk) 11:40, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Wales. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:04, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or Merge/Redirect to List of Wrexham A.F.C. players when that list is created; similar lists already exist for most clubs currently or recently in the English Football League. Peter James (talk) 13:08, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Per above. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 21:22, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:12, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 22:15, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom - there is really no proof of notability anywhere around. Angelo (talk) 16:32, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - can't find any detailed coverage. This BNA search has a few match report mentions in the Abergele & Pensarn Visitor and Vale Advertiser but not enough depth to pass GNG. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:52, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:52, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.