Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Allott

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Daniel (talk) 11:37, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Allott[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reason given on the page to suggest that this was a notable person. I don't see much else which could be added JMWt (talk) 09:18, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Religion, Christianity, and Ireland. JMWt (talk) 09:18, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find anything other that a Burke's peerage mention as "son of" but importance is not inherited. ww2censor (talk) 11:38, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Another in the creating editor's "all deans in the Anglican church are automatically notable" series. No indication that titular subject has notability (independent of the title/role that they held) or has been a core topic of multiple reliable/independent works. As expected by WP:SIGCOV. Certainly all we see here (and all I can find) are directory-style entries. Guliolopez (talk) 17:10, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no indication of notability. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 16:45, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.