Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rich dickerson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Non-Admin Closure - evidence shows that nomination was made in error. Jasynnash2 (talk) 10:20, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Rich dickerson

Rich_dickerson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - (View log)

The capitalization is wrong, and the references are not formatted correctly. The content is, however, legit, so once deleted I will submit a request to have it built by someone who actually knows what they're doing. Rjgarment (talk) 12:24, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:52, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

• Keep and cleanup. The capitalisation problem can be fixed with a page move; contact me if you need someone else to take care of this. I'll see if i can't tidy up the references. SHEFFIELDSTEEL^TALK 17:30, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
• Comment: Content disputes are inappropriate for AfD. Does the nom have any valid deletion grounds to offer?  RGTraynor  20:24, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
• Comment Article has been redirected to appropriate article and the references work. This AfD would seem to be a nomination without valid reasoning and/or a content dispute. Suggest closure as soon as possible. If Rich Dickerson doesn't meet criteria for inclusion it should be nominated and discussed on its own merits/flaws. Jasynnash2 (talk) 09:03, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
• Additionally Please note that the nom originally created the article and appears to have nominated it for deletion per the advise he received on the talk page. I'm gonna have a look at the process and try a non-admin close unless I hear otherwise. Thanks. Jasynnash2 (talk) 10:14, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.