Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rica Paras

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete. * 00:36, 23 April 2010 Fastily (talk | contribs) deleted "Rica Paras" ‎ (Expired PROD, concern was: unsourced BLP) (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:59, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Rica Paras

Rica Paras (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

IP removed BLP PROD, taking to AfD per policy. Currently neutral as I am only taking to AfD and not requesting deletion per technicality. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 23:10, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

• Comment I thought BLP Prod policy was that removing without a source meant you could reinsert the prod, not have to go to AFD. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 06:34, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:00, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:00, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
  • Oops! Never mind, let's see the comments first. I am still neutral though. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 05:34, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 14:57, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

• Delete. Per policy at WP:BLPPROD, the proposed deletion template cannot be removed until sources are added. I've restored the tag. Brad 22:37, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
• Comment Errrr.... somebody deleted it during the course of this AFD, so it's going to be difficult to either improve the article that was sent here, or offer an opnion as to its worth. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 05:06, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.