Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhythm Engineering

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:40, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rhythm Engineering

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reads like PR/advertisement. Fails WP:ORG: I can only find trivial coverage in business journals and local papers. Most references are dead: when salvaged, most don't even mention the company. Primary contributors One800jon and Jambovan are WP:SPA. (See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reggie Chandra.) ~Sp K 20:22, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. ~Sp K 20:22, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. ~Sp K 20:22, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kansas-related deletion discussions. ~Sp K 20:22, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related page for the same reasons as above: it appears to be the company's main/only product, and also does not appear to pass WP:ORG:

Delete and re-write, or userfy. Very much like an ad, but the notability is there in the articles. This is a case where the subject is notable (per WP:GNG and WP:IMPACT) but the article itself needs to be re-written due to WP:NPOV and WP:ADV.--Paul McDonald (talk) 20:33, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Looks like an advertisement of a company. Excessive external linking. Resources are not properly sourced. DMySon 04:20, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.