Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhyncobombyx

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Misspelling, taxon exists, page moved. (non-admin closure) Elmidae (talk · contribs) 07:46, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rhyncobombyx

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

None of the sources provided support the existence of this genus and a Google search for Rhyncobombyx shows no reliable sources. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 04:47, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 05:06, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, on basis that it really has a high proportion of consonants, a (wp:CONSONANTS?) nd relatedly I believe that it is a real thing. --Doncram (talk) 05:59, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Not an issue - it's just a misspelling of Rhynchobombyx, which exists. Closing this. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 07:44, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.