Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhinosaurus
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete and redirect to Rhinoceros. --Coredesat 05:00, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Clear and present hoax. This non-existent dinosaur lived 350 million years before other dinosaurs in the precambrian, eating branches from the tall trees which didn't exist in the precambrian either. Dinosaur-sized bollocks.Grutness...wha? 06:33, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- delete per nom. Googling does produce a lot of hits, which is a sad reflection of poor spelling nowadays. Springnuts 06:51, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to rhinoceros. As Springnuts noted, many people make this spelling mistake, so might as well help them. If you want to delete the hoax before redirecting, I have no objection to that. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:02, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or redirect. All the google results appear to be jokes or misspellings. The latter suggests there is a good argument for redirecting it to rhinoceros. Will (aka Wimt) 08:18, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete- agree with Wimt- does not appear to be a real. Thunderwing 08:24, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and redirect as common spelling mistake, per Sjakkalle. I guess I'm the only one who thinks it's funny enough for WP:BJAODN. cab 08:31, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect per realistic spelling error. MLA 12:38, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and redirect as suggested above, I know I have made this spelling error in the past and people are likely to do it again. Arkyan • (talk) 15:26, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect, no deletion necessary. Misspelling is plausible. Abeg92contribs 18:42, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect, but make sure it is on someone's watchlist, to prevent recreation. J Milburn 19:55, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete utter nonsense. Acalamari 22:37, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete- though I kind of like this word. ;) Metamagician3000 07:22, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and Redirect, since there's no merger, there's no reason to preserve the history, and probably good reason not to do so. (Side note: while it's mildly funny, I definitely don't think it's good enough for the already-bloated BJAODN.) Xtifr tälk 22:21, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.