Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Revelation At The End Of Time

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 10:38, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revelation At The End Of Time[edit]

Non-notable unreleased album. Entirely unsourced and reads like a promotional item. A speedy deletion request under criterion G11 was refused on the grounds that the topic indicated some importance Mattinbgn\^talk 06:58, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 06:59, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No evidence of notability at this stage. Maybe once a single is released it will be. Kevin (talk) 07:48, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The album is unreleased, not commented on in the press and, with the release almost a year away, may be completely different to what Oathy has proposed in interviews. The albums creator has also attracted little to no press interest. - Peripitus (Talk) 10:03, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No notability per WP:CRYSTAL. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 10:21, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unreleased album which may or may not actually be released. Fails notability criteria. no prejudice against creating a new article once the subject is notable. Jasynnash2 (talk) 12:13, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - album may not even meet notability criteria once it is released either --T-rex 15:46, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable musician, let alone album. tomasz. 16:03, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, WP:CRYSTAL seems to apply here. Not totally convinced on the notability of the artist, either. Article can be recreated easily enough if solid press coverage materialises. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 04:56, 22 June 2008 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.