Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rev. Oliver Snow

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:52, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rev. Oliver Snow

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG: the current references are to social media accounts or websites controlled by the subject. I looked for additional sources and found only two blogposts by the same author. Cheers, gnu 57 16:10, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sexuality and gender, Religion, Internet, and West Virginia. gnu 57 16:10, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree with nom, no sources found. Oaktree b (talk) 16:44, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No RS. I searched and couldn't find anything. They're just on social media, but so what? Millions of people are. --Kbabej (talk) 23:26, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not meet notability guidelines Proton Dental (talk) 01:32, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 02:29, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - would have qualified for speedy deletion IMO. Deb (talk) 20:03, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There's plenty of WP:PRIMARY sourcing, but not much of any WP:SECONDARY sourcing at this time. That could change, but for now, Delete. Jacona (talk) 11:32, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.