Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rev.M.J.Prakash

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 17:01, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rev.M.J.Prakash[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced BLP. Nominating to get past an editor continuing to remove BLPPROD tags, I think more out of misunderstanding rather than vandalism. I'd originally simply reinstated the BLPPROD tag, but have taken it here at the request of SwisterTwister. j⚛e decker ^talk 22:13, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Considering that the subject is a pastor, I assumed I was going to find little to nothing of reliable sources and that was the case, yes. I searched both Google US and Google India (English) and found absolutely nothing. It is possible that reliable sources could be another Indian language (Tamil, Hindi, Malayalam, etc.) but I doubt it, again, considering the subject's occupation. SwisterTwister talk 22:30, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:56, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:56, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:56, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The subject might exist and might be what the article says he is. But the article does not establish notability. Austria156 (talk) 02:49, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unsourced BLP with no sources apparent in GNews, GBooks, or GScholar. -- 202.124.73.65 (talk) 10:12, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep -- His presidency of Palanadu Baptist Field Association must possibly make him notable. Since he operates in Inida where the Internet is probably not well-developed and probably in a south Indian language the lack of

Ghits is unsurprising. Furthermore having his surname in the middle of his full name may not help. I take the presidency to be the equivalent of a moderator or an elected bishop to the association, but I have no idea whether that is notable or not. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:58, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Subject is not notable. No outstanding contribution. Only personal life details. No sources.-Rayabhari (talk) 14:28, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.